Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Astronomy, no. 68, p. 37-44 (2023)

UNUSUAL SOLAR ACTIVE REGION NOAA 13088/13102

Nina KONDRASHOVA, Ph.D (Phys. & Math.)
Mail Astronomical Observatory of NAS, Kyiv, Ukraine

Valery KRIVODUBSKIJ, DSc (Phys. & Math.)
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine


Abstract

Background. Under certain conditions, deep fluctuating magnetic fields lead to violations of Hale’s and Joy’s laws of observed magnetism on the surface of the Sun. These magnetic fluctuations can be excited by two qualitatively different mechanisms of a small-scale dynamo. The first mechanism is a macroscopic MHD dynamo, while the second mechanism is a classical MHD diffusion dynamo. An important difference between the two mechanisms is the percentage of observed anti-Hale sunspot groups (relative to the total number of sunspots) in solar cycle minima. In the case of the first mechanism, the percentage of anti-Hale groups does not depend on the phase of the cycle, while the specified percentage associated with the second mechanism should reach its maximum value in solar minima. To separate the minor contributions of the two named sources of magnetic fluctuations, the researchers proposed a theoretical test based on statistical analysis of observational data over long periods of time (Sokoloff, & Khlystova, 2010). According to the proposed test, the percentage of anti-Hale groups of spots increases during the minima of the cycles, which indicates the favor of the diffusion dynamo. In order to confirm the dominant contribution of the diffusion dynamo to the surface magnetism, this work investigates a specific anomalous active region near the solar minimum.

Methods. Macroscopic and classical MHD, which study the behavior of electromagnetic and hydrodynamic fields in turbulent plasma. Analysis of data from observations of the surface magnetism of the Sun.

Results. We investigated the evolution of the NOAA 13088/13102 active region observed on August 24, 2022, shortly after the cycle 25 minimum. For the analysis, data from observations using instruments installed on board space observatories were used. A feature was revealed, which consists in the deviation of the surface magnetic configuration of this active region from Hale’s law of the magnetic polarity of groups of spots and Joy’s law of the inclination of the axes of bipolar groups to the latitudinal direction. In addition, it was established that the active region of NOAA 13088/13102 is characterized by rather high flare activity.

Conclusions. We believe that the magnetic anomalies of the active region of NOAA 13088/13102 that we found were caused by the influence of magnetic fluctuations excited by the mechanism of the deep small-scale diffusion dynamo, since it is this source that gives the most noticeable contribution to the surface magnetism near the cycle minima. The detection and study of unusual anti-Hale’s AOs with increased eruptive activity, similar to NOAA 13088/13102, may find application in predicting periods of dangerous manifestations of space weather and in forecasting the dynamics of solar cycles.

Key words
Solar convective zone, magnetic fields, turbulent dynamo, sunspots, solar flares.

References

Abramenko, V. I. (2021). Signature of the turbulent component of the solar dynamo on active region scales and its association with flaring activity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507, 3698–3706.
Abramenko, V. I., Suleymanova, R. A., & Zhukova, A. V. (2023). Magnetic fluxes of solar active regions of different magneto-morphological classes: I. Cyclic variations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 518, 746–4754.
Abramenko, V. I., Zhukova, A. V., & Kutsenko, A. S. (2018). Contributions from different-type active regions into the total solar unsigned magnetic flux. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 58, 1159–1169.
Biermann, L., & Schlüter, A. (1951). Cosmic radiation and cosmic magnetic fields. II. Origin of cosmic magnetic fields. Physical Review, 82, 863–868.
Brandenburg, A., Sokoloff, D., & Subramanian, K. (2012). Current status of turbulent dynamo theory. From large-scale to small-scale dynamos. Space Science Reviews, 169, 123–159.
Charbonneau, P. (2020). Dynamo Models of the Solar Cycle. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 7, 1–104.
Hale, G. E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S. B., & Joy, A. H. (1919). The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. The Astrophysical Journal, 49, 153–186.
Hale, G. E., & Nicholson, S. B. (1925). The low of sun-spot polarity. The Astrophysical Journal, 62, 270.
Howard, R. F. (1991). Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Physics, 136, 251–262.
Khlystova, A. I., & Sokoloff, D. D. (2009). Toroidal magnetic field of the Sun from data on Hale-rule-violating sunspot groups. Astronomy Reports, 53(3), 281–285.
Krause, F., & Rädler, K.-H. (1980). Mean Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press, Ltd.
Krivodubskij, V. N. (2005). Turbulent dynamo near tachocline and reconstruction of azimuthal magnetic field in the solar convection zone. Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 61–74.
Krivodubskij, V. N. (2021). Role of rotational radial magnetic advection in possible explaining a cycle with two peaks. Advances in Space Research, 68, 3943–3955.
Kryvodubskyj, V. N. (2006). Dynamo parameters of the solar convection zone. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 22, 1–20.
Li, J. (2018). A systematic study of Hale and anti-Hale sunspot physical parameters. The Astrophysical Journal, 867, id.89, 16.
Li, J., & Ulrich, R. K. (2012). Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. The Astrophysical Journal, 758, id.115, 12.
McClintock, B. H., Norton, A. A., & Li, J. (2014). Re-examining sunspot tilt angle to include anti-hale statistics. The Astrophysical Journal, 797, id.130, 10.
Nagy, M, Lemerle, A., Labonville, F., Petrovay, K., & Charbonneu, P. (2017). The effect of “rogue” active regions on the solar cycle. Solar Phys., 292(11), id. 167, 22.
Pal, S., Bhowmik, P., Mahajan, S. S., & Nandy, D. (2023). Impact of anomalous active regions on the large-scale magnetic field of the Sun, eprint arXiv:2305.13145, 19.
Richardson, R. S. (1948). Sunspot groups of irregular magnetic polarity. The Astrophysical Journal, 107, 78–93.
Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., Kosovichev, A. G., Bogart, R. S., Hoeksema, J. T., Liu, Y., Duvall, T. L., Zhao, J., Title, A. M., Schrijver, C. J., Tarbell, T. D., & Tomczyk, S. (2012).The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) investigation for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Solar Physics, 275, 207–227.
Smith, S. F., & Howard, R. (1968). Magnetic classification of active regions. In: Kiepenheuer, K. O. (ed.) Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions. IAU Symposium, 35, 33.
Sokoloff, D., & Khlystova, A. (2010). The solar dynamo in the light of the distribution of various sunspot magnetic classes over butterfly diagram. Astronomische Nachrichten, 331, 82–87.
Sokoloff, D., Khlystova, A., & Abramenko, V. (2015). Solar small-scale dynamo and polarity of sunspot groups. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 451, 1522–1527.
Stenflo, J. O., & Kosovichev, A. G. (2012). Bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun: global analysis of the SOHO/MDI data set. The Astrophysical Journal, 745(129), id. 129, 12.
Tian, L., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2002). The most violent super-active regions in the 22nd and 23rd cycles. Solar Physics, 209(2), 361–374.
Tian, L., Alexander, D., Liu, Y., & Yang, J. (2005). Magnetic twist and writhe of δ active regions. Solar Physics, 229(1), 63–77.
Vitinsky, Y. I. (1968). On sunspot groups with irregular magnetic polarities. Byulleten Solnechnye Dannye, 9, 86.
Wang, Y.-M., & Sheeley, J. N. R. (1989). Average properties of bipolar magnetic regions during sunspot cycle-21. Solar Physics, 124, 81–100.
Xu, Zh., Yan, X., Yang, L., Xue, Zh., Wang, J., & Qin, Y. (2022). Evolution of an emerging anti-Hale region and its associated eruptive solar flares in NOAA AR 12882. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 937, id. L11, 9.
Zeldovich, Y. B., Ruzmaikin, A. A., & Sokoloff, D. D. (1990). The Almighty Chance. World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics. World Scientific Publication.
Zhukova, A., Khlystova, A., Abramenko, V., & Sokoloff, D. (2020). A catalog of bipolar active regions violating the Hale polarity law, 1989–2018. Solar Physics, 295, id. 165, 18.
Zhukova, A., Khlystova, A., Abramenko, V., & Sokoloff, D. (2022). Synthetic solar cycle for active regions violating the Hale’s polarity law. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 1365–1370.

Full text PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/BTSNUA.2023.68.37-44